<rss
      xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
      xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
      xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
      xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
      xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
      version="2.0"
    >
      <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Why Nostr?]]></title>
        <description><![CDATA[A curation of posts explaining why Nostr matters. Learn more at https://nostr.how]]></description>
        <link>https://www.whynostr.org/tag/mastodon/</link>
        <atom:link href="https://www.whynostr.org/tag/mastodon/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
        <itunes:new-feed-url>https://www.whynostr.org/tag/mastodon/rss/</itunes:new-feed-url>
        <itunes:author><![CDATA[brugeman]]></itunes:author>
        <itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[A curation of posts explaining why Nostr matters. Learn more at https://nostr.how]]></itunes:subtitle>
        <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
        <itunes:owner>
          <itunes:name><![CDATA[brugeman]]></itunes:name>
          <itunes:email><![CDATA[brugeman]]></itunes:email>
        </itunes:owner>
            
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 12:54:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 12:54:19 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      
      <itunes:image href="https://i.nostr.build/wJoQLMG5fd5yvVAk.png" />
      
      <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Por qué Nostr es mejor ]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[Nostr ]]></description>
             <itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Nostr ]]></itunes:subtitle>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 12:54:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.whynostr.org/post/d12774a575167d6f/</link>
      <comments>https://www.whynostr.org/post/d12774a575167d6f/</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">naddr1qqgxgvfjxumngcf4xu6nzd3hvsmxvq3qdg7n7g8440wrrqkw2kz88gqrvde0nasfnhxxu64l5pc7x6jkn0xqxpqqqp65wnhvkt5</guid>
      <category>#nostr</category>
      
        <media:content url="https://image.nostr.build/cee17b21b953b29345c03d6c6715530692d6b57d6662dccdc242f62f6f40c7af.jpg" medium="image"/>
        <enclosure 
          url="https://image.nostr.build/cee17b21b953b29345c03d6c6715530692d6b57d6662dccdc242f62f6f40c7af.jpg" length="0" 
          type="image/jpeg" 
        />
      <noteId>naddr1qqgxgvfjxumngcf4xu6nzd3hvsmxvq3qdg7n7g8440wrrqkw2kz88gqrvde0nasfnhxxu64l5pc7x6jkn0xqxpqqqp65wnhvkt5</noteId>
      <npub>npub1dg7n7g8440wrrqkw2kz88gqrvde0nasfnhxxu64l5pc7x6jkn0xquxzskl</npub>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[ignacio]]></dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>En el mundo de las redes sociales descentralizadas, múltiples protocolos buscan resolver problemas relacionados con la privacidad, la interoperabilidad y la resistencia a la censura. Entre ellos, destacan Nostr, AT Protocol (usado por Bluesky) y ActivityPub (adoptado por Mastodon). Cada uno tiene sus méritos, pero Nostr se ha posicionado como una opción innovadora con ventajas únicas que lo diferencian de sus competidores.</p>
<h2>Ventajas del Protocolo Nostr</h2>
<ol>
<li><h3>Sencillez y Minimalismo</h3>
<p>•	<strong>Arquitectura simple</strong>: A diferencia de otros protocolos que requieren complejas infraestructuras, Nostr se basa en un diseño minimalista. Solo necesita claves públicas/privadas y relays para funcionar, lo que reduce los puntos de fallo y facilita su implementación.<br>•	<strong>Facilidad de desarrollo</strong>: Los desarrolladores pueden crear aplicaciones rápidamente sin enfrentarse a las complejidades técnicas de protocolos más elaborados como ActivityPub.</p>
</li>
<li><h3>Resistencia a la Censura</h3>
<p> •	<strong>Modelo distribuido</strong>: Nostr no depende de servidores centralizados ni de federaciones específicas. Esto lo hace más resistente a la censura, ya que los mensajes se replican en múltiples relays, y un relay censurado no afecta al resto del sistema.<br> •	<strong>Claves privadas como identidad</strong>: La identidad de los usuarios no depende de una instancia o servidor. Conservar la clave privada permite mantener el control total sobre la identidad.</p>
</li>
<li><h3>Interoperabilidad y Flexibilidad</h3>
<p> •	<strong>Compatibilidad con múltiples aplicaciones</strong>: Nostr permite que las aplicaciones utilicen el mismo protocolo para diversos casos de uso (mensajería, redes sociales, pagos, etc.), a diferencia de ActivityPub, que está más limitado a redes sociales.<br> •	<strong>Extensibilidad</strong>: Al ser un protocolo simple, puede ser extendido fácilmente para adaptarse a nuevos usos o necesidades.</p>
</li>
<li><h3>Neutralidad y Descentralización</h3>
<p> •	<strong>Sin entidades centralizadas</strong>: Nostr no depende de organizaciones o consorcios que dicten reglas, a diferencia de AT Protocol o ActivityPub, que están influenciados por sus comunidades o estructuras de gobernanza.<br> •	<strong>Incentivos abiertos</strong>: No hay jerarquías ni dependencias, lo que permite una verdadera descentralización sin riesgo de monopolios.</p>
</li>
<li><h3>Privacidad y Seguridad</h3>
<p> •	<strong>Cifrado de extremo a extremo</strong>: Al depender de claves públicas y privadas, se garantiza un alto nivel de privacidad y seguridad en las comunicaciones.<br> •	<strong>Anonimato opcional:</strong> Los usuarios pueden interactuar sin necesidad de compartir datos personales.</p>
</li>
</ol>
<h2>Conclusión</h2>
<p>Nostr destaca entre otros protocolos descentralizados por su sencillez, resistencia a la censura y verdadera neutralidad. Mientras que AT Protocol y ActivityPub tienen sus fortalezas, su complejidad y dependencia de entidades específicas limitan su alcance. Nostr representa una solución ágil y poderosa que podría convertirse en el estándar para un internet más libre y descentralizado.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <itunes:author><![CDATA[ignacio]]></itunes:author>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>En el mundo de las redes sociales descentralizadas, múltiples protocolos buscan resolver problemas relacionados con la privacidad, la interoperabilidad y la resistencia a la censura. Entre ellos, destacan Nostr, AT Protocol (usado por Bluesky) y ActivityPub (adoptado por Mastodon). Cada uno tiene sus méritos, pero Nostr se ha posicionado como una opción innovadora con ventajas únicas que lo diferencian de sus competidores.</p>
<h2>Ventajas del Protocolo Nostr</h2>
<ol>
<li><h3>Sencillez y Minimalismo</h3>
<p>•	<strong>Arquitectura simple</strong>: A diferencia de otros protocolos que requieren complejas infraestructuras, Nostr se basa en un diseño minimalista. Solo necesita claves públicas/privadas y relays para funcionar, lo que reduce los puntos de fallo y facilita su implementación.<br>•	<strong>Facilidad de desarrollo</strong>: Los desarrolladores pueden crear aplicaciones rápidamente sin enfrentarse a las complejidades técnicas de protocolos más elaborados como ActivityPub.</p>
</li>
<li><h3>Resistencia a la Censura</h3>
<p> •	<strong>Modelo distribuido</strong>: Nostr no depende de servidores centralizados ni de federaciones específicas. Esto lo hace más resistente a la censura, ya que los mensajes se replican en múltiples relays, y un relay censurado no afecta al resto del sistema.<br> •	<strong>Claves privadas como identidad</strong>: La identidad de los usuarios no depende de una instancia o servidor. Conservar la clave privada permite mantener el control total sobre la identidad.</p>
</li>
<li><h3>Interoperabilidad y Flexibilidad</h3>
<p> •	<strong>Compatibilidad con múltiples aplicaciones</strong>: Nostr permite que las aplicaciones utilicen el mismo protocolo para diversos casos de uso (mensajería, redes sociales, pagos, etc.), a diferencia de ActivityPub, que está más limitado a redes sociales.<br> •	<strong>Extensibilidad</strong>: Al ser un protocolo simple, puede ser extendido fácilmente para adaptarse a nuevos usos o necesidades.</p>
</li>
<li><h3>Neutralidad y Descentralización</h3>
<p> •	<strong>Sin entidades centralizadas</strong>: Nostr no depende de organizaciones o consorcios que dicten reglas, a diferencia de AT Protocol o ActivityPub, que están influenciados por sus comunidades o estructuras de gobernanza.<br> •	<strong>Incentivos abiertos</strong>: No hay jerarquías ni dependencias, lo que permite una verdadera descentralización sin riesgo de monopolios.</p>
</li>
<li><h3>Privacidad y Seguridad</h3>
<p> •	<strong>Cifrado de extremo a extremo</strong>: Al depender de claves públicas y privadas, se garantiza un alto nivel de privacidad y seguridad en las comunicaciones.<br> •	<strong>Anonimato opcional:</strong> Los usuarios pueden interactuar sin necesidad de compartir datos personales.</p>
</li>
</ol>
<h2>Conclusión</h2>
<p>Nostr destaca entre otros protocolos descentralizados por su sencillez, resistencia a la censura y verdadera neutralidad. Mientras que AT Protocol y ActivityPub tienen sus fortalezas, su complejidad y dependencia de entidades específicas limitan su alcance. Nostr representa una solución ágil y poderosa que podría convertirse en el estándar para un internet más libre y descentralizado.</p>
]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:image href="https://image.nostr.build/cee17b21b953b29345c03d6c6715530692d6b57d6662dccdc242f62f6f40c7af.jpg"/>
      </item>
      
      <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Twitter/X vs Nostr vs Mastodon vs Bluesky vs Threads vs Tumblr]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[Social network comparison between Twitter/X, Nostr, Mastodon, Bluesky, Threads, Tumblr]]></description>
             <itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Social network comparison between Twitter/X, Nostr, Mastodon, Bluesky, Threads, Tumblr]]></itunes:subtitle>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 00:05:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.whynostr.org/post/1728334627801/</link>
      <comments>https://www.whynostr.org/post/1728334627801/</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">naddr1qqxnzdej8qenxdpkxgmnsvp3qgszaszc8f76kmtlacew7r2jt5x2tff22d0mymkgsfe9jthmv0eqmagrqsqqqa28drr8q5</guid>
      <category>twitter</category>
      
      <noteId>naddr1qqxnzdej8qenxdpkxgmnsvp3qgszaszc8f76kmtlacew7r2jt5x2tff22d0mymkgsfe9jthmv0eqmagrqsqqqa28drr8q5</noteId>
      <npub>npub19mq9swna4dkhlm3jaux4yhgv5kjj556lkfhv3qnjtyh0kcljph6s88e295</npub>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Kerivin]]></dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I liked Twitter.</em> News, politics, artists, memes, controversial thoughts that people discuss longer than it deserves.<br>That Twitter wasn't what X is now. Verification doesn't mean anything, it's just an algorithm boost everybody can buy. Crowds of bots leave random overcompressed jpegs in replies to get more attention to get more money for its owner. Somehow it's normal there to want entire nation dead.</p>
<p>I wish it was easy to leave, but it still has hundreds of millions active users. It still has all the memes we like, the controversial thoughts people discuss too much, all the big companies and politicians have to have an account.</p>
<p>I checked out the biggest alternatives to decide where to go. No complicated tech terms ahead, I looked at them as a regular user who just wants to have fun.</p>
<p><strong>TL;DR</strong>: Twitter/X is still the most effective and active platform, but if you really want to change it you should take part in transition to another platform and not wait for more people to be there.</p>
<h2>Nostr</h2>
<p>Decentralized, censorship resistant due to its nature. Of course, it's not perfect and <a href="https://habla.news/fiatjaf/87a208d9">is quite far from reaching its true potential</a>. Out of all the alternatives, Nostr might have the most complicated registration. Do regular users really need to think about public and private keys? Yes, yes, I get it — users <em>have</em> to keep in mind their privacy if they want to have it. But you have to read at least something to understand what you're doing, which is automatically more difficult than simply press "Sign up". And then you have to choose between web clients... And then Android/iOS clients... And some of them might be buggy on your device, so you switch to another client... The flow could be better, but Nostr is a new social network, it keeps improving every day.</p>
<p>After all this, you open an app and see... <em>Bitcoins, AI images, jokes about Elon Musk.</em> And some anarchists.<br>90% of what you see is people praising Bitcoin. The universal social network protocol turns out to has a pretty narrow view. I guess, the feature of attaching your cryptocurrency wallet made it extremely popular amongst Bitcoiners, but why is it the biggest — and probably the only — community there?</p>
<p>How does one find another community? Hashtags don't seem to work, perhaps because of tiny size of non-Bitcoin communities. Trending is all Bitcoin. I didn't even know it's possible to discuss something that long.</p>
<p>It's close to being decentralized and censorship resistant; you can write and read Twitter-like notes or long posts — whatever you like! But I don't feel comfortable because I'm an alien without a Bitcoin wallet here. It could be a great place for everybody, but now it lacks diversity. It may not even want to be universal. Maybe it's the Bitcoin network and that's fine.</p>
<h2>Mastodon</h2>
<p>Decentralized, not so censorship resistant but way better than having everything on one company's servers. 500 symbols per post is more than Twitter, but less than long format, it's somewhere in-between. It literally has no feed algorithm, so you have to find people and hashtags you want to follow, and Mastodon won't help. You don't know what it has in the first place? Bad for you.</p>
<p>Sooner or later your feed start to look like one you're actually want to read. And that's when I started to like Mastodon. The UI is neat, everything is in its place and works as expected — you can tell the social network has been here for a while. <a href="https://www.itworldcanada.com/article/mastodon-passes-the-10-million-account-milestone/533720">There are more than 10 million users as of 2023</a>, and it still grows slowly. Mastodon is mature but fresh, and it does scare you away at first glance. Every discussion is serious for some reason, and I'm yet to discover meme accounts to follow. Mastodon is probably the only decentralized social network on this list which has at least some officials registered here.</p>
<h2>Bluesky</h2>
<p>If you want to move back in time to see the old Twitter again — take a look at Bluesky. Everything is <em>literally</em> the same as Twitter, and it actually might be both a blessing and a curse. It seems to lack its identity and feels not like something new, but like uninhabited, decentralized Twitter.</p>
<p>There is a feed algorithm that shows you a mix of viral and recent posts, so you don't have a desert feeling (which sometimes occurs in Mastodon). Bluesky was launched in open access to the public in February 2024 and has <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/bsky.app/post/3l4cilpvtr22w">reached 10 millions</a> already.<br>There is nothing serious about it — memes, shitposts, random thoughts put in 300 symbols. People barely use hashtags here, one would probably find something interesting or funny just scrolling the feed.</p>
<h2>Threads</h2>
<p>It's weird and soulless. You can't create a Threads account without an Instagram one, so you <em>have</em> to use both while <a href="https://www.facebook.com/privacy/policy/">Meta collects a huge amount of data about you</a>. It just doesn't feel great.</p>
<p>You can't ignore the power of a big corporation — the experience is smooth, the UI is nice, and I personally like the little curl every thread has. And what do you see scrolling the feed? AI images and ridiculously serious inspirational quotes with a beach at the background. They're all different, but none of them makes sense. Do people actually discuss something? Not really. You just post pretty images just like you did on Instagram. And those are beautiful, you can't take that from Instagram userbase, so your feed looks absolutely incredible. And empty. There is nothing wild — no hot takes, no fresh jokes, everything is sterile and correct. It feels dead despite having <a href="https://www.threads.net/@zuck/post/C89oeSORn81">over 175 million monthly active users</a>.</p>
<p>UPD: <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2024/02/09/instagram-and-threads-will-no-longer-proactively-recommend-political-content/">Threads decided you don't want to read any politics</a> and then <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/9/24266096/instagram-threads-moderation-account-post-deleted-limited">disabled a lot of accounts because their AI moderation went insane, apparently</a>.</p>
<p>UPD2: <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/7/24264382/threads-engagement-bait-problem-mosseri-meta">Threads now has an engagement bait problem.</a></p>
<h2>Tumblr</h2>
<p>Yeah, yeah, I know, but hear me out. Tumblr looks interesting for creative communities where people have fun. It goes from the cringiest actor gifs to a detailed book subplot analysis. Your posts don't disappear in the void thanks to hashtag search. There is also a feed algorithm to spend time. If you're really into discussing weirdest story and fanfiction ideas, that's the default social network for you.</p>
<p><em>But.</em></p>
<p>It's also owned by a company that can do everything it wants. <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2018/12/3/18123752/tumblr-adult-content-porn-ban-date-explicit-changes-why-safe-mode">And it actually did</a>.</p>
<p>UPD: I'd been using Tumblr for a week, wrote two posts, liked and reposted a few times, and then my account got terminated for seemingly no reason. Maybe they found something wrong in those two posts, I don't know. I'm not that type of person who would publish anything even remotely aggressive, both posts were about SFW writing tropes.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>There is no perfect platform to move to. If one of them had a clear advantage and/or a big userbase, many people would move there with no hesitation. But the situation is different, there is no obvious preferable social network to stick with. The vast majority stays on X trying to ignore the weird stuff. If we really want to have better and safer social networks, we should encourage competition and migration. All the X alternatives lack communities people would like to join, whereas it should be friendly and welcoming to all. <em>Not the criminals, obviously.</em></p>
<p>My personal favorite is Nostr, but right now Bluesky seems the most convenient option.</p>
<p>P.S. Sorry for mistakes, English is not my native language. This post is not supposed to be some serious analysis, it's just another internet rant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <itunes:author><![CDATA[Kerivin]]></itunes:author>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p><em>I liked Twitter.</em> News, politics, artists, memes, controversial thoughts that people discuss longer than it deserves.<br>That Twitter wasn't what X is now. Verification doesn't mean anything, it's just an algorithm boost everybody can buy. Crowds of bots leave random overcompressed jpegs in replies to get more attention to get more money for its owner. Somehow it's normal there to want entire nation dead.</p>
<p>I wish it was easy to leave, but it still has hundreds of millions active users. It still has all the memes we like, the controversial thoughts people discuss too much, all the big companies and politicians have to have an account.</p>
<p>I checked out the biggest alternatives to decide where to go. No complicated tech terms ahead, I looked at them as a regular user who just wants to have fun.</p>
<p><strong>TL;DR</strong>: Twitter/X is still the most effective and active platform, but if you really want to change it you should take part in transition to another platform and not wait for more people to be there.</p>
<h2>Nostr</h2>
<p>Decentralized, censorship resistant due to its nature. Of course, it's not perfect and <a href="https://habla.news/fiatjaf/87a208d9">is quite far from reaching its true potential</a>. Out of all the alternatives, Nostr might have the most complicated registration. Do regular users really need to think about public and private keys? Yes, yes, I get it — users <em>have</em> to keep in mind their privacy if they want to have it. But you have to read at least something to understand what you're doing, which is automatically more difficult than simply press "Sign up". And then you have to choose between web clients... And then Android/iOS clients... And some of them might be buggy on your device, so you switch to another client... The flow could be better, but Nostr is a new social network, it keeps improving every day.</p>
<p>After all this, you open an app and see... <em>Bitcoins, AI images, jokes about Elon Musk.</em> And some anarchists.<br>90% of what you see is people praising Bitcoin. The universal social network protocol turns out to has a pretty narrow view. I guess, the feature of attaching your cryptocurrency wallet made it extremely popular amongst Bitcoiners, but why is it the biggest — and probably the only — community there?</p>
<p>How does one find another community? Hashtags don't seem to work, perhaps because of tiny size of non-Bitcoin communities. Trending is all Bitcoin. I didn't even know it's possible to discuss something that long.</p>
<p>It's close to being decentralized and censorship resistant; you can write and read Twitter-like notes or long posts — whatever you like! But I don't feel comfortable because I'm an alien without a Bitcoin wallet here. It could be a great place for everybody, but now it lacks diversity. It may not even want to be universal. Maybe it's the Bitcoin network and that's fine.</p>
<h2>Mastodon</h2>
<p>Decentralized, not so censorship resistant but way better than having everything on one company's servers. 500 symbols per post is more than Twitter, but less than long format, it's somewhere in-between. It literally has no feed algorithm, so you have to find people and hashtags you want to follow, and Mastodon won't help. You don't know what it has in the first place? Bad for you.</p>
<p>Sooner or later your feed start to look like one you're actually want to read. And that's when I started to like Mastodon. The UI is neat, everything is in its place and works as expected — you can tell the social network has been here for a while. <a href="https://www.itworldcanada.com/article/mastodon-passes-the-10-million-account-milestone/533720">There are more than 10 million users as of 2023</a>, and it still grows slowly. Mastodon is mature but fresh, and it does scare you away at first glance. Every discussion is serious for some reason, and I'm yet to discover meme accounts to follow. Mastodon is probably the only decentralized social network on this list which has at least some officials registered here.</p>
<h2>Bluesky</h2>
<p>If you want to move back in time to see the old Twitter again — take a look at Bluesky. Everything is <em>literally</em> the same as Twitter, and it actually might be both a blessing and a curse. It seems to lack its identity and feels not like something new, but like uninhabited, decentralized Twitter.</p>
<p>There is a feed algorithm that shows you a mix of viral and recent posts, so you don't have a desert feeling (which sometimes occurs in Mastodon). Bluesky was launched in open access to the public in February 2024 and has <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/bsky.app/post/3l4cilpvtr22w">reached 10 millions</a> already.<br>There is nothing serious about it — memes, shitposts, random thoughts put in 300 symbols. People barely use hashtags here, one would probably find something interesting or funny just scrolling the feed.</p>
<h2>Threads</h2>
<p>It's weird and soulless. You can't create a Threads account without an Instagram one, so you <em>have</em> to use both while <a href="https://www.facebook.com/privacy/policy/">Meta collects a huge amount of data about you</a>. It just doesn't feel great.</p>
<p>You can't ignore the power of a big corporation — the experience is smooth, the UI is nice, and I personally like the little curl every thread has. And what do you see scrolling the feed? AI images and ridiculously serious inspirational quotes with a beach at the background. They're all different, but none of them makes sense. Do people actually discuss something? Not really. You just post pretty images just like you did on Instagram. And those are beautiful, you can't take that from Instagram userbase, so your feed looks absolutely incredible. And empty. There is nothing wild — no hot takes, no fresh jokes, everything is sterile and correct. It feels dead despite having <a href="https://www.threads.net/@zuck/post/C89oeSORn81">over 175 million monthly active users</a>.</p>
<p>UPD: <a href="https://techcrunch.com/2024/02/09/instagram-and-threads-will-no-longer-proactively-recommend-political-content/">Threads decided you don't want to read any politics</a> and then <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/9/24266096/instagram-threads-moderation-account-post-deleted-limited">disabled a lot of accounts because their AI moderation went insane, apparently</a>.</p>
<p>UPD2: <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/7/24264382/threads-engagement-bait-problem-mosseri-meta">Threads now has an engagement bait problem.</a></p>
<h2>Tumblr</h2>
<p>Yeah, yeah, I know, but hear me out. Tumblr looks interesting for creative communities where people have fun. It goes from the cringiest actor gifs to a detailed book subplot analysis. Your posts don't disappear in the void thanks to hashtag search. There is also a feed algorithm to spend time. If you're really into discussing weirdest story and fanfiction ideas, that's the default social network for you.</p>
<p><em>But.</em></p>
<p>It's also owned by a company that can do everything it wants. <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2018/12/3/18123752/tumblr-adult-content-porn-ban-date-explicit-changes-why-safe-mode">And it actually did</a>.</p>
<p>UPD: I'd been using Tumblr for a week, wrote two posts, liked and reposted a few times, and then my account got terminated for seemingly no reason. Maybe they found something wrong in those two posts, I don't know. I'm not that type of person who would publish anything even remotely aggressive, both posts were about SFW writing tropes.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>There is no perfect platform to move to. If one of them had a clear advantage and/or a big userbase, many people would move there with no hesitation. But the situation is different, there is no obvious preferable social network to stick with. The vast majority stays on X trying to ignore the weird stuff. If we really want to have better and safer social networks, we should encourage competition and migration. All the X alternatives lack communities people would like to join, whereas it should be friendly and welcoming to all. <em>Not the criminals, obviously.</em></p>
<p>My personal favorite is Nostr, but right now Bluesky seems the most convenient option.</p>
<p>P.S. Sorry for mistakes, English is not my native language. This post is not supposed to be some serious analysis, it's just another internet rant.</p>
]]></itunes:summary>
      
      </item>
      
      <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Exponential Growth is Cancer ]]></title>
      <description><![CDATA[A brief discussion of why I think Nostr will succeed, slowly.]]></description>
             <itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[A brief discussion of why I think Nostr will succeed, slowly.]]></itunes:subtitle>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 04:20:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>https://www.whynostr.org/post/1689913168231/</link>
      <comments>https://www.whynostr.org/post/1689913168231/</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">naddr1qqxnzd3c8yunzve3xcuryve3qgs897t425q7rfzxfae80krpyrm8ulm7cw5yaa5p8nrkq6l4uzrslucrqsqqqa28tw73df</guid>
      <category>Nostr</category>
      
        <media:content url="https://picsur.thesamecat.io/i/c9f91479-e49f-4085-a8d8-42fcfd6228d9.jpg" medium="image"/>
        <enclosure 
          url="https://picsur.thesamecat.io/i/c9f91479-e49f-4085-a8d8-42fcfd6228d9.jpg" length="0" 
          type="image/jpeg" 
        />
      <noteId>naddr1qqxnzd3c8yunzve3xcuryve3qgs897t425q7rfzxfae80krpyrm8ulm7cw5yaa5p8nrkq6l4uzrslucrqsqqqa28tw73df</noteId>
      <npub>npub1wtuh24gpuxjyvnmjwlvxzg8k0elhasagfmmgz0x8vp4ltcy8ples54e7js</npub>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[nobody]]></dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve watched them come and go: social networking attempts like Mastodon (Activity Pub), Blue Sky, and recently, Threads. They’ve begun to follow what feels very much like a pattern. First basic functionality is built out, then there’s a crisis of some sort on mainstream social media, then there’s a population explosion on the new social network, people quickly become disillusioned, then a population collapse.<br>It can be very tempting, while watching these networks explode their user bases into the millions overnight, to wish for that for ourselves on Nostr. I do not. In fact, I believe this sudden explosive growth is partially responsible for the inevitable decline and collapse of these attempted “replacements” for any of the big corporately owned networks. Social networks don’t fail due to technology issues - they fail because of social issues.</p>
<h2>Culture Matters</h2>
<p>When people exodus a media platform <em>en masse</em>, they bring their culture with them. Their expectations of the types of content they want to interact with, the ways they intend to behave, and the ways they engage with others. These patterns are influenced by two factors in mainstream social: moderation, and tradition. </p>
<ul>
<li>Moderation forms the culture in a top-down way, by establishing the limits of what kind of content will be acceptable on the platform. Platforms with relatively loose moderation policies will tend to attract people that diverge from established norms of behavior, more than those who typically conform. </li>
<li>Tradition also informs culture in unique ways for each platform - the things that are easiest to find, provoke an emotional response, and are easy to share tend to dominate. </li>
<li>Functionality also plays a role, albeit a lesser one, but one that tends to form the unique humor of a platform. Reddit is a fine example of this with its long threads of puns, each one building on the previous post. Hell threads on other platforms are another example.<br>The problem arises because new platforms rarely meet the expectations of another culture formed on another platform. Functionality will be different in subtle but important ways, and the early adopters of the new platform will be interested in different topics. This is very true on Nostr, where posts are rewarded specifically for quality - a metric that is very difficult to quantify, but any long-time user can identify - and an overabundant quantity of posts is more likely to get you muted than followed.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Assimilation Matters</h2>
<p>When users slowly trickle their way into a new platform, they are more inclined to ask questions, and attempt to understand the existing culture. They are the “new kid on the block” and will be more apt to seek feedback if they truly desire to achieve any sort of success. They then add the unique qualities of their personality to this information, and contribute something new to the culture, while still being a part of it.<br>When a large group of users joins all at once, they bring their own connections with them. When the group joining dwarfs the existing user base, they have less motivation to seek advice on how to best utilize the platform to its fullest potential, expecting that they will be able to continue connecting and communicating with their existing contacts in the same way they always have. This will inevitably lead to frustration when the new platform does not provide them with the same success that they had on the former platform - leading to the inevitable conclusion that the “new Twitter (or Facebook, Instagram, et al.)” is not as good as the old one.<br>And so we watch the tides of users go in and out, leaving old platforms in frustration for new ones, only to become equally frustrated with their inability to communicate and reach an audience as effectively as they used to, and returning to the old platform, or seeking yet greener pastures.</p>
<h2>Stability Matters</h2>
<p>Sudden growth causes sudden problems. Both Mastodon and Blue Sky encountered major issues that they were not prepared to handle, and handled badly. Mastodon operators found themselves facing enormous hosting bills, and Blue Sky faces serious obstacles in keeping their promises to provide a “safe” environment with the influx of new users.<br>A slow, steady growth model allows the operators of services to face problems in a more measured way, and to build out both infrastructure and content tools to allow users to have a pleasant experience. It is less likely to take an otherwise major contributor to a project, and make them “tap out” due to rising costs, frustrated users, and a constant crisis mindset.<br>Nostr is a distributed network, and has amazing potential for horizontal scaling. Even if one in ten-thousand users who onboards onto Nostr decides to run a relay, the network will be in good shape. Content distribution can be handled in a large number of ways - it isn’t tied fundamentally to the protocol itself - which allows many different providers to be used, and new ways of handling content to be built.<br>But creating those relay operators and content hosts out of newbies takes time. A truly educated relay admin capable of handling the job of maintaining a secure and reliable relay takes weeks or days at best, assuming they are already familiar with similar tasks. Adding 10 million users overnight - the way Threads did - is likely to swamp existing providers before new providers have time to step in a fill the gap. Which would also have the effect of chilling user experience.<br>There is a lot of new terminology and capability to take in when joining Nostr. For the mainstream person, they are going to have to learn about: cryptographic keys, Nostr Addresses (NIP-05), Lightning Wallets, Zaps and by proxy Bitcoin, and eventually Lists, Relay Management, Paid Relays, how to find content, moderate their own feed, and more. Right now, Nostr is doing an excellent job of answering those questions and educating users on the new terminology and techniques <em>because the flow is small and steady</em> with a few bursts.</p>
<h2>The Tortoise and The Hare</h2>
<p>I truly believe that the success of Nostr will be in no small part because it is growing steadily instead of all at once. Every user onboarded correctly adds to the army of people ready to help welcome the next little wave of people who learn about the decentralized and censorship resistant qualities of Nostr. These individuals are also given the time to become part of a kinder social group than is typically found on social media, and learn to truly become productive and successful as true Nostriches rather than just transplants from another place.</p>
<p>And that is truly the magic isn’t it? People don’t just move to Nostr, they become Nostriches. They become part of a real community, and they belong with us. We take refugees from other social media sites, and don’t leave them refugees. I think that’s beautiful and worth slowing down to do.</p>
<p>I don’t look to the short term for Nostr - I’m bullish for Nostr in the long haul. We are building to still be here after the others have already burnt themselves away. It reminds me of my home country: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>“Give me your tired, your poor,  your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
      <itunes:author><![CDATA[nobody]]></itunes:author>
      <itunes:summary><![CDATA[<p>We’ve watched them come and go: social networking attempts like Mastodon (Activity Pub), Blue Sky, and recently, Threads. They’ve begun to follow what feels very much like a pattern. First basic functionality is built out, then there’s a crisis of some sort on mainstream social media, then there’s a population explosion on the new social network, people quickly become disillusioned, then a population collapse.<br>It can be very tempting, while watching these networks explode their user bases into the millions overnight, to wish for that for ourselves on Nostr. I do not. In fact, I believe this sudden explosive growth is partially responsible for the inevitable decline and collapse of these attempted “replacements” for any of the big corporately owned networks. Social networks don’t fail due to technology issues - they fail because of social issues.</p>
<h2>Culture Matters</h2>
<p>When people exodus a media platform <em>en masse</em>, they bring their culture with them. Their expectations of the types of content they want to interact with, the ways they intend to behave, and the ways they engage with others. These patterns are influenced by two factors in mainstream social: moderation, and tradition. </p>
<ul>
<li>Moderation forms the culture in a top-down way, by establishing the limits of what kind of content will be acceptable on the platform. Platforms with relatively loose moderation policies will tend to attract people that diverge from established norms of behavior, more than those who typically conform. </li>
<li>Tradition also informs culture in unique ways for each platform - the things that are easiest to find, provoke an emotional response, and are easy to share tend to dominate. </li>
<li>Functionality also plays a role, albeit a lesser one, but one that tends to form the unique humor of a platform. Reddit is a fine example of this with its long threads of puns, each one building on the previous post. Hell threads on other platforms are another example.<br>The problem arises because new platforms rarely meet the expectations of another culture formed on another platform. Functionality will be different in subtle but important ways, and the early adopters of the new platform will be interested in different topics. This is very true on Nostr, where posts are rewarded specifically for quality - a metric that is very difficult to quantify, but any long-time user can identify - and an overabundant quantity of posts is more likely to get you muted than followed.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Assimilation Matters</h2>
<p>When users slowly trickle their way into a new platform, they are more inclined to ask questions, and attempt to understand the existing culture. They are the “new kid on the block” and will be more apt to seek feedback if they truly desire to achieve any sort of success. They then add the unique qualities of their personality to this information, and contribute something new to the culture, while still being a part of it.<br>When a large group of users joins all at once, they bring their own connections with them. When the group joining dwarfs the existing user base, they have less motivation to seek advice on how to best utilize the platform to its fullest potential, expecting that they will be able to continue connecting and communicating with their existing contacts in the same way they always have. This will inevitably lead to frustration when the new platform does not provide them with the same success that they had on the former platform - leading to the inevitable conclusion that the “new Twitter (or Facebook, Instagram, et al.)” is not as good as the old one.<br>And so we watch the tides of users go in and out, leaving old platforms in frustration for new ones, only to become equally frustrated with their inability to communicate and reach an audience as effectively as they used to, and returning to the old platform, or seeking yet greener pastures.</p>
<h2>Stability Matters</h2>
<p>Sudden growth causes sudden problems. Both Mastodon and Blue Sky encountered major issues that they were not prepared to handle, and handled badly. Mastodon operators found themselves facing enormous hosting bills, and Blue Sky faces serious obstacles in keeping their promises to provide a “safe” environment with the influx of new users.<br>A slow, steady growth model allows the operators of services to face problems in a more measured way, and to build out both infrastructure and content tools to allow users to have a pleasant experience. It is less likely to take an otherwise major contributor to a project, and make them “tap out” due to rising costs, frustrated users, and a constant crisis mindset.<br>Nostr is a distributed network, and has amazing potential for horizontal scaling. Even if one in ten-thousand users who onboards onto Nostr decides to run a relay, the network will be in good shape. Content distribution can be handled in a large number of ways - it isn’t tied fundamentally to the protocol itself - which allows many different providers to be used, and new ways of handling content to be built.<br>But creating those relay operators and content hosts out of newbies takes time. A truly educated relay admin capable of handling the job of maintaining a secure and reliable relay takes weeks or days at best, assuming they are already familiar with similar tasks. Adding 10 million users overnight - the way Threads did - is likely to swamp existing providers before new providers have time to step in a fill the gap. Which would also have the effect of chilling user experience.<br>There is a lot of new terminology and capability to take in when joining Nostr. For the mainstream person, they are going to have to learn about: cryptographic keys, Nostr Addresses (NIP-05), Lightning Wallets, Zaps and by proxy Bitcoin, and eventually Lists, Relay Management, Paid Relays, how to find content, moderate their own feed, and more. Right now, Nostr is doing an excellent job of answering those questions and educating users on the new terminology and techniques <em>because the flow is small and steady</em> with a few bursts.</p>
<h2>The Tortoise and The Hare</h2>
<p>I truly believe that the success of Nostr will be in no small part because it is growing steadily instead of all at once. Every user onboarded correctly adds to the army of people ready to help welcome the next little wave of people who learn about the decentralized and censorship resistant qualities of Nostr. These individuals are also given the time to become part of a kinder social group than is typically found on social media, and learn to truly become productive and successful as true Nostriches rather than just transplants from another place.</p>
<p>And that is truly the magic isn’t it? People don’t just move to Nostr, they become Nostriches. They become part of a real community, and they belong with us. We take refugees from other social media sites, and don’t leave them refugees. I think that’s beautiful and worth slowing down to do.</p>
<p>I don’t look to the short term for Nostr - I’m bullish for Nostr in the long haul. We are building to still be here after the others have already burnt themselves away. It reminds me of my home country: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>“Give me your tired, your poor,  your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”</p>
</blockquote>
]]></itunes:summary>
      <itunes:image href="https://picsur.thesamecat.io/i/c9f91479-e49f-4085-a8d8-42fcfd6228d9.jpg"/>
      </item>
      
      </channel>
      </rss>
    